A Politico for Monday after Easter:
 You do not want to War as a first option, a big war against a big army, with not known vast consequences!
 You try and seem no so vehement about the options you have or think about the Clerical Gov of Iran.
 So you try the use of time frames and deals, and sanctions.
 Obviously you hope time will bring forward a generation and Government that does not want Nuclear Atomic (Thermo nuclear) weapons.
 And you keep the headache or try to pass it on to future US governments!
 What to do? I think it could not be more complicated! Would a hungry poor Iran government want to suicide attack with atomic weapons or a more robust Government and country conditions! It is a tricky decision!
 Who else would join in a given War against Iran in their aid?
 Do you flatten vast areas, more than War Iran?
 Are civilians being really used as always, as human shields?
 Would Israel do the first attacks to see the results and reacctions of Iran?
 We are all believing that the World, won't permit a Middle east Atomic weapons race.
The likely deal with Iran won’t be perfect, but it still holds potential for making the Middle East safer.